- Home
- Slip and Fall
Slip and Fall Lawyer in Central Pennsylvania
Jameson Stone Law represents people injured by unsafe conditions on someone else’s property. Ethan Stone leads the firm’s injury work, and the firm has litigated injury matters in both state and federal court. These claims turn on evidence that does not stay available for long, which is why the first call matters more here than in most injury cases.
Premises Liability
Who Is Actually Responsible for the Hazard
The party that owns a building is often not the party responsible for the condition that caused the fall. A grocery store leases its space. A management company handles common areas at an apartment complex. A contractor was paid to salt the lot and did not show. Each of those arrangements sits inside a lease or a service agreement that nobody hands you afterward, and it is common for more than one party to carry responsibility.
Getting this right early matters, because a claim built against the wrong party burns months the deadline will not give back. If a municipality, a school district, or a state agency turns out to be involved, the deadline is far shorter than two years, which is covered further down this page. Working out who controlled the area, who was responsible for maintaining it, and who insured it is the first thing the firm does on a premises case.
Why Timing Matters
The Evidence Starts Disappearing Immediately
These claims are won or lost on proof that the hazard sat there long enough that somebody should have dealt with it. That proof has a short life.
What tends to be gone first:
- Surveillance footage — overwritten on cycles often measured in days
- The hazard itself — mopped, salted, or repaired within minutes of your fall
- Maintenance and inspection logs — retained only when someone asks for them in writing
The Defense
What the Property Owner's Insurer Will Argue
Three arguments come up in almost every premises claim. That the hazard was open and obvious and you should have seen it. That the condition had not been there long enough for anyone to know about it. That your injuries came from something other than the fall. Each one is answerable, and each one is answered with evidence rather than argument, which is why the first few weeks decide so much.
Pennsylvania also lets the other side shift blame onto you. Under the state’s modified comparative negligence rule, whatever share of fault is assigned to you comes off your recovery, and if that share passes half you recover nothing. In winter cases the defense has a further tool in the hills and ridges doctrine, which limits liability for naturally accumulated snow and ice during and just after a storm. Both are workable. Neither is worth handling alone against an insurer that does this every day.
Hills and ridges has real limits, and they matter more than the doctrine does. It reaches entirely natural accumulation only, so it does not cover ice formed by a downspout draining across a walkway, a blocked gutter, or a pile of cleared snow that melted and refroze. It also does not cover an isolated patch of ice where the surrounding area was otherwise clear. Establishing which of those you fell on is evidence work, and it is the reason the photographs matter as much as they do.
Cases We Take
Slip & Fall Cases We Handle
Wet & Slippery Floors
Tracked-in water, mopped tile with no cone out, and leaking coolers in grocery and retail aisles.
Unsafe Stairs & Walkways
Loose treads, missing handrails, and code problems in stairwells, entryways, and shared hallways.
Parking Lot Accidents
Ice from a downspout, potholes, wheel stops, and unmarked changes in level.
Poor Lighting & Property Hazards
Dark stairwells, obscured drop-offs, and hazards in apartment common areas a landlord was responsible for.
Our Process
How We Build a Slip and Fall Claim
01
Move on the Evidence
Preservation letters go out first, to the owner, the tenant, and any management company, so footage and records stop being overwritten while the rest of the work happens.
Establish What They Knew
Incident reports, cleaning and inspection logs, prior complaints, and witness accounts, all aimed at showing the condition existed long enough that someone should have addressed it.
Value the Claim and Negotiate
Medical records, lost income, and expected future treatment are totaled into a written demand. If the offer does not reflect it, suit is filed inside the deadline.
Frequently Asked Questions !!
People talk themselves out of these claims more often than any other kind, usually because something about the fall feels like it was partly their own doing. That instinct is worth testing against the law rather than acting on, since it is rarely as decisive as it feels.
Can I still make a claim if I fell on snow or ice?
Often yes, though Pennsylvania makes winter cases harder than most states do. The hills and ridges doctrine shields property owners from liability for naturally accumulated snow and ice while conditions are generally slippery during and shortly after a storm. To recover in those conditions you normally have to show the snow or ice had built into ridges or elevations large enough to obstruct travel, that the owner knew or should have known, and that the accumulation is what caused the fall. Two situations sit outside the doctrine altogether. An isolated patch of ice when conditions were not generally slippery, and ice that formed because of the property itself, such as a leaking gutter or a drain discharging across a walkway. Both are ordinary negligence claims, and both are common.
How long do I have to file a slip and fall claim in Pennsylvania?
Two years from the date of the fall under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524, with one exception that catches people out. If a government body may be responsible, a municipal sidewalk, a borough building, a school district property, or a state facility, written notice of the claim has to be filed within six months of the injury under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5522. Miss that window and the claim against the government can be lost while the two year clock is still running. Whether a government body is involved is not always obvious from where you fell, which is a further reason not to sit on it.
What if I was partly at fault for my own fall?
You can still recover. Pennsylvania uses modified comparative negligence, so a share of fault reduces what you recover rather than ending the claim, provided your share does not pass half. Found twenty percent responsible, and your recovery drops by twenty percent. Insurers know this and lead with it, because most people who fall assume they were careless and never make the call at all. Whether the split being proposed is defensible is worth putting to someone before you accept it.
Find Out Where You Stand
Ethan Stone handles the firm’s injury work and will tell you plainly whether a claim is worth pursuing. Bring whatever you have, photographs, the incident report, the name of the store. The first conversation costs nothing.