Jameson Stone Law represents children and their families in juvenile matters across Central Pennsylvania, and Ethan Stone leads the criminal work. Juvenile court is a separate system with a different purpose written into the statute, and the outcomes worth having are mostly available early, before a petition has even been filed.
A Different System
The Juvenile Act creates a separate court for conduct that would be criminal in an adult, and it sets out three aims that operate together: protecting the public, holding the young person accountable, and building the skills they need to return to the community. That balance is in the statute rather than in a mission statement. The finding at the end is an adjudication of delinquency, not a conviction, and it is made by a judge rather than a jury.
None of which makes it minor. Placement, probation, school notification and a record that follows a young person into applications are all real possibilities. But the system is built to be capable of ending without any of them, and that capability is the reason to get someone involved at the start rather than at the first hearing.
The Two Best Outcomes
There are two routes worth understanding, and they sit at different points. Informal adjustment happens before a petition is ever filed, with the matter handled through probation on conditions and nothing further following. A consent decree comes after a petition but before any finding, placing the child under supervision instead of adjudicating them delinquent. Neither produces an adjudication of delinquency.
What happens afterward improved in 2024. Six months after a successful discharge from either route, with nothing else pending, the court is now required to begin expungement proceedings on its own rather than waiting for a petition. That is a materially better position than an adult who completes a diversion programme and finds years later that nobody ever moved to clear the record.
Adult Court
Not every case involving a child begins in juvenile court. Murder is excluded from the definition of a delinquent act entirely, and a number of serious offences are excluded where the child was fifteen or older and a deadly weapon was involved, or where there is a prior adjudication for one of them. Those cases are charged in adult criminal court from the outset.
Where that has happened, decertification is the route back. It is a motion to transfer the case into juvenile court, decided on the child’s age and maturity, their amenability to treatment and supervision, and the nature of what is alleged. It is contested, it turns on evidence rather than argument, and in a case where it is available it is the most consequential thing that will happen.
What We Handle
Representation through the detention, adjudication and disposition hearings, and in the period before they even begin.
Informal adjustment and consent decrees, the two routes that can end a case without an adjudication.
Moving a case charged in adult court back into juvenile court, which is a contested motion.
Clearing the record afterward, including old matters that were closed years ago and never properly expunged.
Our Process
01
The best outcomes are available before a petition is filed, so the first call matters more than the first hearing.
Informal adjustment or a consent decree, argued on your child's own circumstances rather than left to whatever gets offered first.
Following the expungement through at the end, so the file is genuinely gone rather than simply assumed to be closed.
Most parents arrive at this with two instincts, and one of them is usually wrong. Cooperating fully and quickly feels like the responsible thing to do. Waiting to see how serious it becomes feels like the measured thing to do. The first can cost your child the case, and the second can cost them the diversion.
Not before you have spoken to a lawyer. This is the single point where families do the most damage while trying to do the right thing. A child can waive their rights and be interviewed, and what they say is usable, and young people routinely explain themselves in ways that establish exactly what needs establishing. Declining an interview is not obstruction and it is not an admission. It preserves a decision that can be made properly once somebody knows what is actually being alleged. The same applies to school administrators, who are not police but whose accounts end up in the file all the same.
It depends entirely on how the matter ends. A case resolved through informal adjustment or a consent decree produces no adjudication of delinquency, and the record can be expunged six months after discharge. An adjudication is a different position, and while juvenile records are not public in the way adult convictions are, they are not invisible either, and certain applications and licensing processes reach them. Which is the practical argument for aiming at the routes that leave nothing to explain rather than at the shortest path through the hearing.
For most charges, no. For a defined set of serious offences it is possible, and for some of them the case starts in adult court rather than being transferred there. Where a child is fifteen or older and a deadly weapon is alleged, or where there is a prior adjudication for one of those offences, that is the scenario to ask about immediately. Decertification exists to move such a case back into juvenile court, but it is contested and it needs preparing rather than requesting. If this is the situation you are in, it is the reason to call today rather than after the next hearing date.
Informal adjustment is only available before a petition is filed, which means the window on the best result closes before most families have understood there was one. Ethan Stone leads the firm’s criminal work, and the first conversation costs nothing.